Fish Hooks vs Wildlife, Pt I

Written by Shera Mercer

Comments

0 Comments

Leave a Comment

(This is part I of a IV part series on barbless circle hooks)

 

A photographer friend once asked me, is there a conflict between spearfishers and scuba divers? Some say they have competing interests – one is there to see things, the other to hunt them – and if in the same area and with poor visibility, it could get dangerous. Others say not really, we are all there to enjoy the ocean, and the practice of taking fish for food is as older than the Hawaiians. When we are all responsible, respectful and alert, I don’t see a problem. Both groups love the ocean and being in the ocean, both groups benefit from a healthy reef. To be honest, if a spearfisher is out getting dinner and freediving, it strikes me as a far more honest way to get fish than other options! So I’m all for it – and I have a lot of respect for the skill it takes to put it all out there. 

I see more of an issue with (the impacts of) boat fishing. To be clear, I am not against fishing for food; on occasion I eat fish and among other things, there is a long and culturally-important history of fishing in Hawaii. To me, fishing itself is not the problem, but rather the lack of care and inadvertent impacts that harm marine life. Let me explain. In the last year we have started to see far more small juvenile sharks with hooks in their cheeks, jaws, even their eyes. It was getting so bad that we saw far more with hooks than without. I asked around and our diving friends all were seeing the same thing – at its worst, over 80% of the sharks we saw had hooks in their mouths (rough estimate). It’s  heartbreaking. Little sharks, 2-3 ft long, some looking quite distressed, and occasionally with hooks as big as 5 inches. Imagine trying to eat with a 5 inch hook in your jaw. We do see quite a few honu (Hawaiian green turtles) and occasionally a monk seal as well.

 

 

So I’ve been trying to understand both why it happens and what can be done. Fishing is a very popular sport here in Hawaii, and one of the most popular is Ulua fishing (known as giant trevally in other parts of the world). These are big, beautiful game fish, it’s easy to see why they are so prized. But there’s no telling what will take the ulua bait and hook – and too often it’s a little shark instead of the far more desirable ulua. Not much can be done about that. And let's be clear – these fishermen are likely NOT looking for shark fins – that is an entirely different issue. I doubt they want to hook little sharks any more than the sharks want to be hooked. No, the question is about the release – can the hook be removed? If not, what happens to the shark (or turtle, or seal) after? What can be done to minimise the damage? I would of course prefer that the hook be removed before release, but NOAA has been doing a lot of work with local fishermen, and say that while fishermen try to get the hooks out, its not always possible. (Being realistic, we can hardly blame the fishermen for not wanting to put their hand in an injured sharks mouth...)

 

So if we can’t stop the sharks (and turtles and seals) from swallowing hooks, and the fishermen are unable to unhook the errant animal, what can be done to help? Happily, there is something that authorities in both fishing and conservation agree on – the type of hooks used can greatly improve the survival of a mistakenly hooked animal without lowering the catch rate. They're called barbless circle hooks, and in the next few posts I'll tell you about them, J-hooks and circle hooks…read Part II here!